Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest

The History Channel: The Bible

NoHistoryHistorySo the History Channel is starting a new 5 part series tonight called “The Bible.”  Here are some thoughts:

The story of Abraham starts out with too many “extra” biblical characters and dialog that is irritating and I am only 15 minutes into the presentation.  For instance, the first 10 minutes Abraham is portrayed as saying “God will take care of us” at least three times. Not that the statement is not true, it just feels contrived.  The Bible is not lacking in powerful phrases, why not use them. Why not use the simple, repeated phrase:  I believe God.

Lot’s wife is portrayed as a nag, the battle cry of Abraham’s armies that free Lot “Trust in God” is a mixture of Braveheart and an Islamic “God is great” cry.  It is portrayed as a human drama as opposed to the history of salvation.  Lot’s settling in Sodom is portrayed semi-accurately as a battle between Abraham’s shepherds and Lot’s shepherds, but then Lot’s wife makes the weird statement that they should settle in Sodom because “the future is in the city.”

The tension between Abraham and Sarah over Hagar was done well.  But they are going to skip over the key passages in favor of the more dramatic human interest story.  The interaction between the three messengers from God was well done.  Unfortunately they turned the angels leading Lot and his family out of the city into a Stephen Segal cum ninja sword fight.  I don’t think the story necessitated the “extra” drama.

So we arrive at chapter 19 with only  a brief mention of the covenant passages integral to the story (Genesis 12, 15, 17).  No mention of the necessary language of the story:  seed, covenant, promise.  The presentation denuded of this primary language misses the main plot of the Bible.  So in the first 20 chapters of the Bible, the story of Lot takes a primary place, this is odd to me as I am looking for the message implicit in this great book. It has maintained that test not because of the Lot story or the Sodom story but because of the greater underlying plot.

In the 21st century why are we still portraying Bible characters as “white”.  Only the bad guys (Hagar, for instance) even remotely resemble middle easterners.  Isn’t this critical miscue enough to make you want to turn it off?  It would be like telling the story of slavery in America and not using African American actors.  Betty White starring as Harriet Tubman.  This kind of presentation is not helpful,  and it is mind boggling.  Sarah and Isaac are English?

The story of Moses is next up.  Again, it is odd to me that details that don’t need to be changed are changed.  For instance, when Moses kills an Egyptian for beating an Israelite, the Bible says that Moses waited for a moment where he would not be seen.  In the History Channel version, Moses kills the Egyptian in full site of many, the man taking the beating offers to hide the body.  Why the change?  It doesn’t seem any harder to portray it accurately, it makes more sense as well.

I loved the emotion of the plagues, the shortening of the section was well done.  Pharaoh’s arrogance and resistance was passionate.  The Passover story is the center of the Moses story, but it doesn’t get the attention it deserves to set up the rest of the story.

Instead of giving us an accurate picture of Egyptian Pharaohs (the necessary beard that signified their kingship and the plaited hair worn by them) we get the familiar Yul Brynner look.

I give the History Channel a C for their presentation and interpretation of the first two books of the Bible.  This didn’t give the viewer ANY new or pertinent information that they already have gleaned from previous dramatic versions of these incidents.  This is the “History Channel” and  it seems that a reworking of the watered down dramatic versions misses the mark.  The drama is not as good as it could be, and the history is only used as fodder for that mediocre drama.  I am being generous with my grade.  The series is just OK.

 

Subscribe to the TempleBlog

Top Posts

What's TheTempleBlog?

The TempleBlog started as my personal blog in October of 2006 with my first post: John Stott – it was a listing of John Stott quotes.

Now it is a different place. I mostly write about two of my convictions: Pacifism and Racism. But I also offer resources: both digital and personal. 

If you need Bible Study materials, want to take a more serious look at theology via an online course, or want to dialog with me about ministry and what I call Spiritual Construction, fill out the form here and we can connect and see where the relationship goes. 

SBK Productions

KellyBagdanov.com is your online source for Homeschooling Resources and Art History Curriculum. She also offers several unique devotionals which incorporate Art History with the Church Calendar. Check out her upcoming Christmas Devotional series which would work for individuals, families, small groups, and churches. 

More Articles

Church

Thoughts on 4th of July Church Services

It has been a rough road for the reputation of Christianity. This weekend that reputation was on display. Churches all over the country, in defiance of common sense and the clear and important restrictions given to us by health officials and government entities, met openly in crowded indoor spaces, singing and otherwise ignoring universal guidelines

Read More »
Church

Eucharist Alone

Today was both the beginning of Holy Week and for many Christians around the globe, a day to celebrate the Lord’s Supper/Eucharist. We did it alone. I used to bristle a little at weddings, when in the context of the body of Christ, we offered communion to the wedding party only – the congregation didn’t

Read More »
Bible

Widows, Pennies, & Church at Home

I have been posting thoughts about Sunday worship on our church’s Facebook page, usually titled: “Best Things I Heard Today.” With our changing meeting landscape I thought I would expand that practice in to a blog post.

Read More »