Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest

God is not a King

A longstanding conversation in theology has to do with how we know things about God and how we describe what we “know” about God. One way this has been stated in theological circles is “all of our knowledge about God is analogical.” I have used the phrase: “all theology is analogy” many times in conversations. Here is what it means and why it is important.

Sunday in church we sang the hymn: Crown Him with Many Crowns. One of the lines is: “Crown Him with many crowns, The Lamb upon His throne.”

The song describes Christ as a king (seated on a throne, deserving of crowns) and as a lamb. Jesus is neither a king, nor a lamb.

These descriptions of Jesus are analogous. The description is an attempt to use a symbol that is commonly understood and to use it as an analogy of something that is difficult to understand. When we do this we must distinguish the way the symbol is like the target and the way it is unlike the target. To say that Jesus is a lamb is to say he is like a lamb in some ways, but not necessarily in all ways (the technical term for this is “analogical predication” 1).

Jesus is a “lamb” not in the same way that Fluffy is a lamb. He doesn’t walk on all fours. He isn’t covered in wool. He doesn’t “baa” like a lamb. He is a lamb in the limited (and analogical) sense that early Judaism knew lambs: as the sacrificial offering of atonement specifically at Passover. But Jesus is not “equal” to that lamb either (although the body and blood analogies of Eucharist/Communion arise from the same definition of “lamb”).

Jesus is a king but not in the same sense that Caesar is a king. He never had a “kingdom” meaning that he never ruled over a piece of geography with a population of people. Even now, the usage of “throne,” “crown.” and other elements associated with a king are not meant to be the equivalent when in reference to Jesus. IN the same way that Jesus is not a “lamb” he is not a “king.” It would be a mistake to picture Jesus on an actual throne somewhere in “heaven” seated next to another “throne” where the Father was seated. 

The reason that all theology is analogy is an important discussion is that making these kinds of statements equivocal (Jesus = lamb) in some instances makes the statements non-sensical and in other instances makes the statements vague or culturally constrained. It is odd that in the USA, which at its basic political construction is “anti-king,” we elevate Jesus as a king. It is a cultural oddity that demands clarification. The easiest way to see this is that we have to explain the lyrics to the hymn Crown Him with Many Crowns, they are not self-evident without the context of the Old Testament and Judaism.

Theology as analogy as a definitive statement of the theological process is important because it points out our limitation in knowing, understanding, and explaining God. We only know God through the lens of our knowledge, which is human and has borders. We can see this limitation in the study of religion throughout history. We can see this limitation in the critiques of religion in statements like:


“Man is, and always has been, a maker of gods. It has been the most serious and significant occupation of his sojourn in the world.”


(John Burroughs / 1837-1921 / American essayist)

“God is not a king” is an accurate statement. We say things about God that we think are accurate by grabbing certain things from the definition of “king” and applying them to God as a means of describing the indescribable. So we like the definition of king for God when it means, “powerful, benevolent, gracious” and reject the definition when it means “despot, domineering, neglectful.”

All theology is analogy is most readily demonstrated in the Incarnation. The idea that God became a man and took on human flesh is the admission that the highest, best, most clear way that we have of knowing God is to put him into a human costume. This is because our knowledge is limited to anthropomorphism (the attribution of human characteristics to God, or the use of human analogies to describe God). That is all we have, our knowledge of God is limited by this. Even if we try and get around it by appealing to revelation as a primary means of knowing God, the revelation must “condescend” to us. God has to use pictures and language we understand, ie, anthropomorphism and analogy.

Why is this important?

Much of our confusion about God falls into the area of apprehension, understanding, and interpreting analogies and their meanings. Where does the analogy end? What does it include and exclude? Sometimes it is easier (lambs) and sometimes it is more difficult (kings, Father, etc). Often this is the place where we start name calling (liberal, heretic, etc.). Knowing that all theology is analogy may make us more careful with our theological constructions and applications, and maybe make us less strident in our theological stances. 

  1. In Logic, we study the three modes of predication: univocity, equivocity, and analogy. As will soon become obvious, predication is not the same as “definition.” In univocal predication, I apply a word to two things in exactly the same way. In equivocal predication, I apply the word to two things in a completely different way. In analogical predication, I apply the word in partly the same and partly a different manner. http://catholicism.org/analogical-knowledge-of-god.html

Subscribe to the TempleBlog

Top Posts

What's TheTempleBlog?

The TempleBlog started as my personal blog in October of 2006 with my first post: John Stott – it was a listing of John Stott quotes.

Now it is a different place. I mostly write about two of my convictions: Pacifism and Racism. But I also offer resources: both digital and personal. 

If you need Bible Study materials, want to take a more serious look at theology via an online course, or want to dialog with me about ministry and what I call Spiritual Construction, fill out the form here and we can connect and see where the relationship goes. 

SBK Productions

KellyBagdanov.com is your online source for Homeschooling Resources and Art History Curriculum. She also offers several unique devotionals which incorporate Art History with the Church Calendar. Check out her upcoming Christmas Devotional series which would work for individuals, families, small groups, and churches. 

More Articles

Church

Thoughts on 4th of July Church Services

It has been a rough road for the reputation of Christianity. This weekend that reputation was on display. Churches all over the country, in defiance of common sense and the clear and important restrictions given to us by health officials and government entities, met openly in crowded indoor spaces, singing and otherwise ignoring universal guidelines

Read More »
Church

Eucharist Alone

Today was both the beginning of Holy Week and for many Christians around the globe, a day to celebrate the Lord’s Supper/Eucharist. We did it alone. I used to bristle a little at weddings, when in the context of the body of Christ, we offered communion to the wedding party only – the congregation didn’t

Read More »
Bible

Widows, Pennies, & Church at Home

I have been posting thoughts about Sunday worship on our church’s Facebook page, usually titled: “Best Things I Heard Today.” With our changing meeting landscape I thought I would expand that practice in to a blog post.

Read More »